
Paraguay Autonomie: Crafting a Resilient Micro-Community
The plan below, created in late 2024, has been trimmed down and revised based on reality. The current plan (May 2025) is to create a good neighborhood in the countryside and not to seek the level of integration initially thought.
Hereunder are details of our proposed plan for a micro-community. All these details help you to understand what we want to build as a group. For some of you, it is a lot to take in. For others, you are already in alignment with most of the content. Is it doable? Yes, if we want it to happen.
Please feel free to suggest improvements to this content.
Every Sunday at 6 pm UTC, i am running a call to discuss this initiative. Message me at julienparaguay@tuta.com to register.
Table of contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Who We Are
1.2. Why This Initiative?
1.3. What We Want to Build
1.4. How We Want to Build It
2. A Day in Our Resilient Micro-Community
3. Context setting
3.1. The Word “Community”
3.2. Why consider a micro-community model?
3.3. Community versus traditional set-up
4. The People
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Thinking Alignment
4.3. How Big Is the Micro-Community?
4.4. Folks We Welcome
4.5. Folks That Won’t Fit
4.6. Team Formation Process
4.7. Spanish Language
4.8. Children
4.9. People and Their Pets
4.10. People Beyond the Micro-Community
5. Capabilities
5.1. Skills Required
5.2. Tools
6. The Land & Ownership
6.1. Search Criteria
6.2. How Much Land Do We Need?
6.3. Land Prices in Paraguay
6.4. Where Do We Search for Land?
6.5. What Are the Potential Setups to Purchase a Piece of Land?
7. Financials
7.1. People’s Budget
7.2. Initial Costs
7.3. Recurring Costs
7.4. Revenues
7.5.Financial Structure & Responsibilities
8. Cultivating Our Resilience
8.1. Guiding Principles
8.2. Developing Autonomy
8.2.1. Thinking Autonomy
8.2.2. Drinking Healthy Water
8.2.3. Eating Clean and Healthy at a Relatively Cheap Cost
8.2.4. Healing Our Body
8.2.5. Creating Our Energy
8.2.6. Communicating With Each Other
8.2.7. Ability to Move
8.2.8. Revenue Generating Activities
8.3. Tools Supporting Our Autonomy
8.4. Consolidating Best Practices
9. Operating Guidelines
9.1. Defining Shared Activities
9.2. Group Collaboration Method
9.3. Decision Making
9.4. The Work is Visible
9.5. Sync-ups
9.6. Time Allocated to Common Activities
9.7. Entries and Exits of People
9.7.1. Entering the Micro-Community
9.7.2. Exiting the Micro-Community
9.7.3. Temporary Absences
9.8. Resolving Disputes in the Community
9.9. Ensuring Security
9.10. Managing Risks
10. Our Homes
11. Weekly Well-Being Check-In
12. Local Integration
13. Timeline
13.1. Where Do We Stand on this Initiative?
13.2. What Are the Next Steps?
13.3. How Long Do i Need to Commit for?
14. Long-Term Vision: a Network of Micro-Communities

1. Introduction
1.1. Who We Are
We are Julien and Brenda. In 2024, after years of searching for a place where we could have more independence, we finally settled in Paraguay.
We are now forming a group of individuals and families dedicated to building a micro-community in Paraguay that fosters autonomy, collaboration, and well-being. As a group, we aim to create a living environment where like-minded people can thrive together while balancing individual independence and collective support.
1.2. Why This Initiative?
Traditional living models—whether renting or owning a home—are becoming increasingly isolating and financially unsustainable. Rising costs, global uncertainties, and the fragility of centralized systems are pushing people to look for better ways to live that emphasize resilience, self-sufficiency, and mutual support.
By forming a micro-community, we aim to:
Lower living costs by pooling resources and sharing infrastructure.
Enhance security and stability through a trusted social network.
Increase self-sufficiency in food, water, energy, and health.
Improve quality of life by fostering a strong sense of community and connection to nature.
1.3. What We Want to Build
We envision a sustainable and cooperative community where each individual contributes their skills and knowledge to build a life that is:
Autonomous – Producing partially or fully our own water, food, healing, and energy supply.
Collaborative – Working together on common goals while respecting individual space.
Resilient – Adaptable to external disruptions, with a strong foundation for long-term sustainability.
We cultivate a context supportive of our Well-Being and Happiness.
1.4. How We Want to Build It
We plan to build our micro-community by pooling our skills, resources, and shared vision to create a living environment that balances private independence with collective support. Our strategy involves acquiring a suitable piece of land and developing both individual and communal spaces that work together to foster sustainability and resilience.
Here are key components of the how:
Develop private spaces that allow each member to maintain personal autonomy and privacy.
Establish shared spaces for common activities such as food production, social gatherings, and joint infrastructure projects.
Implement sustainable systems for water, energy, and food, reducing dependence on external sources.
Adopt a consensus-based decision-making process to ensure fair and adaptive governance.
Start small and grow gradually, testing and refining our living arrangements as trust and collaboration develop.

2. A Day in the Life of a Resilient Micro-Community
To help you grasp what we are building, i am going to use a real-life example. The example of one day in a micro-community of 8 adults, 3 children, and 3 dogs. Below you will read a simulated yet quite real schedule of activities.
The People in the Community
Couple 1: Lucas (38, builder) & Clara (36, homeschooler) – 🧒🧒2 kids: Melia (8) & Tomas (5) 🐕🐕 (2 dogs)
Couple 2: Mateo (40, IT consultant) & Elena (39, herbalist, skilled in natural medicine)
Couple 3: Daniel (45, writer) & Maria (42, permaculture expert, skilled in vegetable gardening) 🐕 (1 dog)
Individual 1: Gabriel (50, doctor, works online) – 🧒1 kid: Emiliano (10)
Individual 2: Sofia (62, experienced homesteader, skilled in food preservation)
Resilience Streams & Community Activities
🥕 1. Food autonomy
Morning:
Maria & Sofia harvest vegetables and check for pests in the vegetable garden.
Daniel & Lucas feed the chickens and geese and collect eggs.
Sofia & Emiliano check the fish in the pond.
Afternoon:
Maria processes vegetables for storage.
Sofia teaches Emiliano how to fillet fish for dinner.
Lucas & Daniel chop firewood for the outdoor oven.
Evening:
The community enjoys a shared dinner of grilled tilapia, garden vegetables, and homemade herbal tea.
💧 2. Water autonomy
Morning:
Lucas checks the well pump to ensure smooth water flow.
Clara teaches the kids about water filtration using sand and charcoal.
Afternoon:
Maria & Gabriel work on the drip irrigation system for the vegetable garden.
Sofia (62) & Emiliano collect water from the river for washing.
🏡 3. Shelter & infrastructure resilience
Morning:
Lucas & Daniel continue building the short-term rental house in the common space.
Mateo installs solar-powered lights near the communal area.
Afternoon:
Elena & Gabriel repair a roof leak in one of the houses.
Lucas leads a skills workshop on adobe wall construction for those interested.
🩺 4. Health & healing resilience
Morning:
Elena collects herbs for drying and medicine-making.
Gabriel checks on minor health concerns within the community.
Afternoon:
Clara & Elena teach the kids about basic first aid and natural remedies.
Elena prepares tinctures and salves for storage and trade.
📚 5. Education & skill-building
Morning:
Clara teaches science (focused on aquaponics and the fish pond).
Gabriel leads a basic first-aid workshop for kids.
Daniel & Mateo discuss critical thinking and problem-solving with the older kids.
Afternoon:
Lucas leads a construction workshop on building with natural materials.
Sofia (62) teaches Emiliano how to preserve food through drying and fermentation.
Individual Schedules
🔨 Lucas (Builder)
6:00 AM Wakes up
6:30 AM Feeds chickens and geese
7:30 AM Breakfast
8:30 AM Works on fence repair
12:00 PM Lunch (fasts some days)
2:00 PM Leads construction workshop
5:30 PM Chops firewood for outdoor oven
7:00 PM Shared dinner
9:30 PM Sleeps
🏡 Clara (Homeschooler)
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Prepares breakfast
8:30 AM Homeschooling (science & aquaponics)
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM First-aid class with kids
7:00 PM Reads bedtime stories
9:00 PM Sleeps
🧒 Tomas (5) - Child
7:00 AM Wakes up
7:30 AM Breakfast
8:30 AM Homeschooling (basic lessons with Clara)
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM Collects eggs with Lucas
4:00 PM Plays with Sofia & Emiliano
7:00 PM Shared dinner
8:30 PM Bedtime stories
9:00 PM Sleeps
🧒 Melia (8) - Child
7:00 AM Wakes up
7:30 AM Breakfast
8:30 AM Homeschooling (science & aquaponics)
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM Helps with vegetable garden
4:00 PM Plays by the river
7:00 PM Shared dinner
8:30 PM Reads bedtime stories
9:00 PM Sleeps
💻 Mateo (IT Consultant, Fasts Occasionally)
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Starts online work
12:00 PM Lunch (fasts some days)
2:00 PM Installs solar-powered lights
5:30 PM Helps with wood chopping
7:00 PM Shared dinner
11:30 PM Sleeps
🌿 Elena (Herbalist, Fasts Occasionally)
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Collects herbs
9:00 AM Online herbal medicine sales
12:00 PM Lunch (fasts some days)
2:00 PM Prepares tinctures
5:00 PM Repairs a roof leak
7:00 PM Shared dinner
10:30 PM Sleeps
✍️ Daniel (Writer, Fasts Occasionally)
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Feeds animals
9:00 AM Online writing work
12:00 PM Lunch (fasts some days)
2:00 PM Leads discussion on critical thinking
5:30 PM Chops firewood
7:00 PM Shared dinner
10:00 PM Sleeps
🌱 Maria (Gardener)
6:00 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Harvests vegetables
9:00 AM Works on irrigation
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM Prepares food for storage
7:00 PM Shared dinner
10:00 PM Sleeps
🩺 Gabriel (Doctor, Fasts Occasionally)
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Online consultations
12:00 PM Lunch (fasts some days)
2:00 PM Works on irrigation
7:00 PM Shared dinner
9:30 PM Sleeps
🧑 Emiliano (10) - Child
6:30 AM Wakes up
7:00 AM Checks fish traps with Sofia (62)
7:30 AM Breakfast
8:30 AM Homeschooling (science & first aid)
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM Learns food preservation with Sofia (62)
4:00 PM Plays by the river with Sofia & Tomas
7:00 PM Shared dinner
8:30 PM Reads with Gabriel
9:00 PM Sleeps
🐟 Sofia (62, Homesteader)
6:00 AM Wakes up
6:30 AM Fishing
9:00 AM Teaches Emiliano food preservation
12:00 PM Lunch
2:00 PM Stores preserved food
7:00 PM Shared dinner
9:00 PM Sleeps
Summary of Joint Activities (by Time of Day)
8:30 AM Homeschooling -> Clara, Gabriel, kids
8:30 AM Feeding animals & harvesting food -> Daniel, Maria, Sofia, Emiliano
9:00 AM House construction & repairs -> Lucas, Daniel, Mateo
10:30 AM Online work -> Mateo, Gabriel, Daniel, Maria
2:00 PM Herbal medicine & food storage -> Elena, Sofia
2:30 PM Drip irrigation setup -> Maria, Gabriel
5:30 PM Chopping wood for cooking -> Lucas, Daniel
7:00 PM Community dinner -> Everyone welcome

3. Context setting
3.1. The Word “Community”
The word community has developed a negative connotation over the past decade. Unsurprisingly, some of the people I speak with react unfavorably when I use it, often associating it with failure, hippie movements, or idealistic “peace and love” groups.
In a world where division is being actively encouraged, it’s no surprise that one of the strongest forms of unity—community—is under attack. As you may know, altering the meaning of words is a common tactic used to create confusion and weaken societal bonds.
I’ve considered alternative terms like eco-village, co-living area, or good neighborhood, but none truly capture what a community represents. Just because a word is being distorted or misrepresented (as we’ve seen with words like man, woman, science), doesn’t mean we should abandon it. On the contrary, we should stand firm in using it correctly.
So, I ask you—don’t let external narratives push you into rejecting the idea of living and collaborating with like-minded individuals. Community, at its core, is about strength, support, and shared purpose. Let’s reclaim it.
3.2. Why consider a micro-community model?
The traditional approach to living—owning or renting a home or flat—has been the standard for decades. This model was sold to us as the norm, and like many, I have followed it for years. However, as society becomes increasingly fragmented and the cost of living continues to rise, I feel the need to explore a different approach—one where like-minded individuals come together to enhance autonomy, pool resources, and strengthen their position, while still maintaining privacy and independence.
In a world that is becoming more uncertain and unpredictable, it makes sense to regroup with those who share similar values and are willing to collaborate to navigate current challenges and prepare for the future. With many foreigners moving to Paraguay, we have a unique opportunity to plan, build, and create something meaningful—together.
I have also looked at multiple community models and i think that the micro-community model is the least risky.
3.3. Community versus traditional set-up
The traditional model of living typically involves renting or buying land with a house on it—or building your own home. This is the familiar approach most people are used to. But how does it compare to a micro-community model, especially in the context of Paraguay and the desire to increase autonomy?
The Traditional Model: Owning Your Home
Advantages:
You make all decisions independently.
There are no external constraints outside of legal and financial responsibilities.
You own 100% of your home (at least on paper).
Disadvantages:
High costs—You need the full purchase amount and must cover all taxes, maintenance, and improvements alone.
Any enhancements require your own time, money, or effort.
You are mostly on your own, unless you build a strong local support network.
Achieving food, water, energy, and health autonomy alone is difficult and expensive.
If you travel, leaving your home unattended can be risky, especially in rural Paraguay.
Reselling can be hard—Paraguay’s real estate market is illiquid.
The Micro-Community Model
Advantages:
Lower cost—You invest less while still achieving your goals.
Faster progress—Land can be improved much quicker with teamwork (if people work well together).
Better affordability—You can access more resources than you could alone.
Greater flexibility—Exiting the community should be simple if structured correctly.
More security—You can travel with fewer concerns about your home’s safety.
Crisis resilience—A strong community can support its members in times of social breakdown.
More bargaining power—A group can negotiate better deals than an individual or family.
Disadvantages:
Finding the right people can be challenging.
Shared spaces require compromise, which may feel restrictive at times.
Some decisions require group input, meaning you must factor in others' perspectives.
Getting started takes time—Building a strong foundation doesn't happen overnight.
If conflicts arise, there must be a clear protocol to handle them.

4. The People
4.1. Introduction
The success of this project depends entirely on the people involved. That’s why we must be intentional about who we bring in.
Some will challenge what we’re doing—and that’s okay. This initiative requires serious willpower, and we aim to build it with people who have the character to see it through. We are looking for individuals with strong values, not just those who talk but those who take action. People who are in Paraguay with a clear purpose and who can commit to a long-term plan.
After living in Paraguay for seven months, I’ve encountered all kinds of people. Some are opportunistic. Some carry deep personal trauma. Others project their own faults onto others, much like certain Western leaders did during the plandemic. Some will try to sabotage what you’re building simply because they feel they should be the ones leading the change. Paraguay, like anywhere else, has its fair share of people with negative mindsets and destructive behaviors—it’s important to recognize them and stay clear.
At the same time, Paraguay is home to incredible people. People with strong values. People who have gone through life-altering experiences that reshaped their worldview. Some are still navigating their struggles, but they are resilient. There are also highly motivated individuals with valuable skills—people eager to learn, build, and create a new future for themselves. These are the people we want to surround ourselves with.
4.2. Thinking alignment
To go into this initiative together we should ensure that our worldviews are aligned on some fundamental things. If our views diverge on fundamental things, it is too risky to team up. It could jeopardize the whole group.
It means that we are going to have to talk about deeper stuff than the weather in Paraguay. Some topics are uneasy to bring up in conversations but we will have to discuss them.
Here are the topics we should be aligned on:
Our worldview has been partially fabricated and part of it is incorrect. The “incorrect” part has been crafted to mislead us.
It’s fundamental to challenge things and to ask why we do things this way.
Our well-being and happiness are top priorities and we take actions to progress them.
Money may be required to progress our well-being and happiness but it is not our top priority.
We agree that we have to reach some level of autonomy in key domains (food, water, energy, healing) versus the current system and we think we should use some of our time, energy, and/or money to achieve this.
We understand that Western economies do not seek the well-being and happiness of populations but are using toxins in water, food, energy, and healing solutions to impact them negatively.
A reminder to the reader that you are invited to comment and challenge this document. Do not stay silent. It’s a living document.
4.3. How Big Is the Micro-Community?
I would say a maximum of 8 adults is a good number to start. This doesn’t include children. We could imagine between 0 and 2 children per 2 adults. Some couples won’t have kids with them, some will have 1 or 2. It would be difficult to include a family with numerous children at the start. It’s a decision to be taken as a group.
If we start with too many People, it will be hard to align and get anything done. Great communities start small.
As the micro-community operates well we can progressively add more People.
If needed, other micro-communities can be started if the interest is high. An idea is to develop a network of micro-communities in the longer term. These micro-communities can interact and learn from each other.
4.4. Folks we welcome
Hereunder is a list of key characteristics we expect to find in the People who will join this group and take part in the initial purchase. For each characteristic, feel free to ask yourself or someone who knows you well whether you have it or not.
You live in Paraguay or you are about to arrive in Paraguay to live in Paraguay. Your interaction with this group can start before arriving in Paraguay but your integration can only happen once you are here in Paraguay. It is fundamental that you meet other People in person so that you feel comfortable with them and they feel comfortable with you.
You have spent time in Paraguay and see yourself living here for the next few years. It would be too risky to pick someone who has not spent time in Paraguay as this person or their family may not like it or may realize it is not what they expected.
You genuinely plan to stay in the community for at least a few years. Only engage in this initiative if you can commit to it. If you know that something is very likely to happen (you will run out of cash, you are going to die, your kids will need to be in Asuncion, etc.) and will impact this commitment, then you should not join this initiative.
You have challenged and continue to challenge the beliefs you adopted. This means you do not simply accept statements or ideas pushed onto you by others. Instead, you actively question and critically evaluate these statements to form your own understanding. You are open to adapting your beliefs when presented with new evidence or perspectives.
The outcomes you are after must align with what other teammates seek:
Well-being and happiness. We prioritize the health of our mind and our body as well as our happiness.
Team spirit. We work as a team.
Autonomy of thinking, water, food, healing, energy, communication, and transportation. 100% autonomy in all domains may not be doable. We seek realistic objectives.
Resilience. It means that, if anything happens around us, we should be less impacted than the average person.
You put People first and invest in the quality of your life. You may not openly say it but you do it. In this micro-community, you invest in People, not in an asset with the hope of making a profit. It means that you are going to allocate a part of your week to collaborate, interact, and work with the People in the group.
You can follow community rules and guidelines. The group will define these rules and guidelines.
You can contribute to the micro-community’s culture. You participate in activities that are essential to the group’s morale: group breakfast, lunch or dinner, celebration of achievements, workshops, etc.
You use resources soundly: food, water, energy, healing solutions, etc.
You can be of any age but the key point is that you can handle yourself.
If you are younger, your parents need to take care of you (if you are not able to take care of yourself). We won't accept minors who are on their own.
You can be of any culture, religion, or geographical provenance.
You are aware of what is happening (“The Great Reset” / “New World Order”) and are not okay with being told or mandated what you should do, especially when this narrative is mostly a lie to progress the interest of a few. We do not expect you to have a deep understanding of the whole agenda.
You respect yourself. It implies that you care about your health. This is often visible. You likely do regular exercise and/or practice mindfulness.
You are someone with good values. Examples: honesty, respect, fairness, transparency, … Your actions are aligned with your values.
You speak any language but you have a language in common with other teammates. You are committed to learning Spanish as this will be the recommended language for interactions within the community. We expect you to spend some hours per week learning Spanish. It could be done as a group for those who want to do it as a group. We do not want language groups to appear where People start to only interact with People who speak their mother tongue.
You listen to others. You are not constantly talking. You leave space for others to express themselves, especially the folks who tend to be introverted. As you listen to others, you have an opportunity to understand their message. This will be important as many of you are skilled and experienced folks. Yet, you should listen to others.
You are okay with being part of a team. You want to do (build, create, plan, …) things together.
You can deal with disagreement or conflict. This is important to prevent the escalation of tensions and unresolved conflicts.
You have physical, mental skills and/or experiences that you are willing to share with the group. Examples: farming, physical exercise, mindfulness practices, healing, etc.
You are a doer, not only a talker. Some folks will talk a lot and not do any action or very little. The project will require actions, by all teammates. In this context, we cannot take in the team folks who spend most of their time talking as this will impede the team.
You are emotionally stable. While we understand that everyone can get emotional at some point in time, there is no point in bringing in the team People who are not emotionally stable.
You are tolerant. You may have a position on a specific topic but you respect the viewpoint of others. Let's use an example. Imagine that you are vegan. It's your choice but you shouldn't push your practice on others. You are welcome to inform the group about this diet but not to push for it to be the norm in the group. Another example is firearms. It may be inconceivable for you not to have a firearm at home but you shouldn't push for other People to be able to handle firearms, especially if they do not feel comfortable with them.
You can give without expecting to get something back in return. If you are highly transactional then you are unlikely to feel comfortable in this group.
4.5. Folks That Won’t Match the Project
Although the section above describes the characteristics of folks we seek and you could deduce folks we do not seek to attract by taking the opposite of each above statement, we also explicitly mention below the personality traits we do not want.
People who are seeking a financial investment out of the micro-community. If the outcome you are after is success through financial gains then your actions will be aligned with this objective and consequently, won’t be aligned with well-being and happiness.
However, you may have a business activity on the land, with or without People from the group. You may also have financial activities under your name or a separate legal structure outside of this micro-community.
People who are looking for a gated community. Gated communities aim to create an island of perceived safety inside society. Although we value safety, we use another approach.
People who are looking for a hippie style/peace and love community.
People who do not respect others.
Examples: behave rudely, do not listen to other People, repeatedly try to impose their views on others, ...
People who look down on local People.
Examples: has mean statements about local folks, treat local People unfairly, ...
People who consistently complain or have negative behaviors. While it is fine to complain from time to time, we do not seek People who constantly unjustifiably complain.
People who are stuck in the “rabbit hole”. This point is important as, if you are stuck in the “rabbit hole”, you will negatively impact the team. The typical attitude of somebody stuck in the rabbit hole is to constantly or very often talk about what is happening in the West. While it is worth understanding the situation we do not need endless confirmation of what is happening. We have passed this stage and our energy needs to be directed towards what we want to achieve.
People who aren't ready to work with other team members. If you aren't ready to work as a team, there is no point for you to join a team.
Examples: doesn't engage with other teammates, lives independently on the land without any engagement with others, doesn't contribute their skills to the group, ...
People who seek to take advantage of the project and will not contribute to it.
In the current context, a share of the population has become opportunistic and only seeks their interest. I have met folks like this in Paraguay, especially foreigners. This project could be a perfect solution for opportunities as they could benefit from the work of the team without doing much or anything.
Examples: People who say they would contribute but don't; People who seek to access and use other's resources but do not contribute back; ...
Manipulative people. Do note that opportunist People are often manipulative.
Examples: People regularly trying to influence other People's decisions, People not attending team gatherings but pushing their agenda in the back, …
Dogmatic People. People who are convinced that their opinion is correct and push other folks to accept it. Extreme position on a topic leads to polarization.
Examples: in Paraguay, you will meet some folks who preach cryptocurrency as a religion; you will also meet folks who push their diet as a religion.
Emotionally unstable people. While we understand that we can get emotional from time to time, we don't expect People to have intense and rapidly changing emotions. This could lead to impulsive behaviors, overreacting to minor issues, mood swings, and inability to handle setbacks. Often, in times of hardship, these People can become dangerous for the group.
People who are in the rat race. This is visible by a few signals: constant pursuit of money, competitive mindset, and not caring about their mind and body health. These People are operating exactly as Globalists want us all to operate. We cannot have this profile in the group.
People who are energy-draining. Although this may be a subjective criterion, People would usually agree that someone is energy-draining or not. It’s fundamental that each one of us maintains a good energy level. If someone is energy-draining, it will suck the energy of others.
People who are too old to take care of themselves. They could be accepted if another team member can take care of them. Accepting People who cannot take care of themselves will impact the time, energy, and money required by the team. Note that there is a special case for family members of settlers. It is mentioned in the operating agreement.
People who have a judicial background related to violence or sexual aggression.
4.6. Core Team Formation Process
We are going to spend a significant amount of time together. There will be ups and downs. There will be great times but also shitty moments. There will be arguments. We may see folks acting in ways we never thought they would. All this is expected.
Two actions can considerably lower the risk of teaming up with the wrong People and being negatively impacted when an issue occurs.
You must be confident that you see yourself spending the next few years with the other People. To gain this confidence, you will have to take several actions.
We, as a group, must have mechanisms in place (protocols) that help us to deal with issues. When issues occur, we must follow these protocols as they have been prepared to help us in tough situations. It is not when we are in a tough situation that we should allocate time to define a process to manage it.
Let’s detail these two actions.
Action 1. Being confident that you see yourself interacting, weekly, over the next few years with this person.
It is for you to identify what is it that you need to do or check to be able to say that you feel comfortable interacting with the other persons weekly, over the next few years. I am not saying daily because some People will rightly think that it is not healthy to spend every single day together.
This is not an easy task so i asked chat GPT (an AI) what it would need to do/check to be able to determine if it feels comfortable interacting with someone weekly over the next few years. Here is its answer:
1. Alignment of Interests and Values
Shared Interests: Is there a strong foundation of shared interests or goals that makes our conversations engaging and productive?
Mutual Respect: Do they show respect for different viewpoints, making discussions open and enriching?
Intellectual Curiosity: Do they have a willingness to explore ideas deeply and collaboratively?
2. Quality of Interaction
Constructive Engagement: Are our discussions thoughtful, meaningful, and forward-thinking, or do they tend to stall or go in circles?
Flow and Energy: Do I feel energized or drained after interacting with this person? A good connection usually leaves me feeling inspired or at least neutral.
Ability to Listen: Do they actively listen and contribute constructively, rather than dominating conversations or dismissing input?
3. Trust and Dependability
Consistency: Can I trust them to show up and engage reliably week after week?
Integrity: Do they approach interactions with honesty, transparency, and good intentions?
Growth-Oriented: Are they open to learning and adapting, creating room for both of us to grow through our interactions?
4. Long-Term Compatibility
Alignment of Timelines and Goals: Do our life goals or interests overlap enough to sustain ongoing conversations over the years?
Conflict Resolution: How do they handle disagreements or differences in perspective? A constructive approach is critical for long-term collaboration.
5. Personal Comfort and Chemistry
Empathy: Do they show understanding and care for my thoughts and emotions?
Humor and Lightness: Is there a natural rapport that includes moments of humor or lightness, making interactions enjoyable?
No Red Flags: Do I feel safe and valued in the relationship, without any significant concerns about manipulation, judgment, or unreliability?
What I Would Check or Test
Consistency Over Time: Observe how our interactions evolve over several weeks—are they consistent, or do they fluctuate in energy and engagement?
Handling Challenges: Look at how we navigate misunderstandings or disagreements. Do we resolve them respectfully?
Depth and Variety: Assess whether we can sustain meaningful conversations on diverse topics, not just a few narrow interests.
Energy Match: Reflect on whether our communication rhythms align—does it feel natural, or does it require significant effort to maintain?
Conclusion: If the person demonstrates shared values, engaging conversations, mutual respect, and reliability, I’d feel comfortable interacting with them weekly over the years. If one or more of these areas is lacking, I’d consider discussing or reassessing the dynamic. What’s your perspective? Does this align with how you evaluate ongoing interactions?
Action 2. Protocols to deal with issues.
They will not be described in another document.
4.7. Children in the Micro-Community
Children are an integral part of our micro-community, and their well-being, education, and integration into daily life are essential for a balanced and sustainable living environment. We aim to create a space where children can grow in a safe, engaging, and autonomous way, while also ensuring that their presence contributes positively to the community as a whole.
Education & Learning
Parents are responsible for their children's education and personal development.
Homeschooling is the primary education model, allowing flexibility and alignment with family values.
Learning is hands-on and community-driven, incorporating essential skills such as gardening, animal care, water management, and basic first aid.
Children are encouraged to interact with nature, fostering independence and self-reliance.
Regular educational activities, such as language learning (Spanish), practical science, and creative skills, are supported by community members who wish to contribute.
Children’s Role in the Community
While children are not expected to take on heavy responsibilities, they should gradually participate in age-appropriate tasks.
Activities such as feeding animals, planting crops, helping in the kitchen, and assisting in simple maintenance are encouraged to instill a sense of responsibility.
Play and exploration are valued, with dedicated safe areas where children can interact freely without disrupting essential community tasks.
Parents are expected to supervise and guide their children, ensuring they respect common spaces and community agreements.
Safety & Boundaries
A safe environment will be maintained where children can explore while staying within reasonable boundaries.
Children should be aware of natural risks such as rivers, farm animals, and wild fauna.
Parents are responsible for teaching their children basic survival skills, including water safety and how to handle local wildlife encounters.
The community will establish clear rules regarding children’s movement, especially in shared areas.
Community Involvement & Socialization
Regular social gatherings and group activities will encourage children to interact with both adults and other children.
Events such as storytelling, music, seasonal celebrations, and skills workshops will be organized.
Children will learn through immersion in daily life, developing strong social, cognitive, and physical abilities through their interactions with the community.
Parental Responsibilities & Expectations
Parents must ensure that their children respect the privacy and autonomy of other community members.
The micro-community is not a childcare service—each parent is responsible for their child’s behavior, safety, and education. However, other People in the micro-community may volunteer to take care of your kid(s), at times.
Parents must strike a balance between their involvement in community tasks and caring for their children.
4.8. People and Their Pets
We welcome pets in the community, but to ensure harmony between people, animals, and shared spaces, clear guidelines are necessary. Without them, daily life could quickly become stressful for both pet owners and non-pet owners.
Key Considerations for Bringing Pets
Reasonable pet limits: The group will decide on a reasonable number of dogs or cats per household. For example, a family with eight dogs could create issues such as excessive barking, waste management problems, and conflicts with farm animals. Having many pets may also reduce your ability to participate in community activities.
No aggressive dogs: Dogs that display dangerous behavior, such as attempting to bite or attack people, should not be brought into the community.
Spaying & neutering: To prevent unwanted pregnancies among dogs in the community, we may require spaying or neutering unless a clear reason is provided for not doing so.
Noise control: If your dog barks excessively, it can disturb the peace and trigger a chain reaction with other dogs (both in the community and from neighbors). While barking in response to legitimate threats (intruders, wild animals, sudden scares) is expected, a constantly barking dog is disruptive.
Owner responsibility: You must be able to manage and control your dog. If your dog does not obey basic commands or consistently ignores your attempts at discipline, this will be a problem.
Waste management: Dogs and cats should not regularly relieve themselves in community spaces such as shared paths, gardens, or gathering areas. Owners are expected to clean up after their pets whenever possible.
Pet health & hygiene: Keeping your pet healthy, parasite-free, and vaccinated is your responsibility. The community may provide guidance or support, but ultimate care falls on the owner.
Pet-free areas: Some common spaces—such as a fitness area, fish pond, or food storage zones—may be designated as pet-free for hygiene and safety reasons.
Freedom & responsibility: While dogs do not need to be leashed in the common area, owners must ensure their dogs do not cause issues. Consider the following:
Vehicles and visitors will be moving in and out—your dog must not create safety hazards.
If your dog leaves the property, this is your responsibility.
If your dog attacks People or animals outside of your property this is your responsibility.
Your dog may encounter or fight with wild animals—be aware of this risk.
4.9. Spanish Language
A key dimension of the integration in a new country is the language. Some folks arrive in a new country and do not bother learning the language. These folks often stay with People speaking their language and their integration with local folks is usually inexistant. They are also not well-perceived by local People. This is what happened to many German People in Paraguay.
If you already speak a descent Spanish, perfect.
If you do not speak Spanish or your Spanish is basic, you should improve it by learning it. Speaking a descent Spanish will:
facilitate your integration with local folks.
help you to interact with People you meet around you.
reduce the risk of misunderstanding with the local folks who work with us.
To improve our Spanish, we can identify a few actions such as learning on a mobile app, learning in groups, setting Spanish speaking times, play board games involving learning Spanish.
4.10. People Beyond the Micro-Community
Beyond the People who will be part of this micro-community, Julien and some of you have built a network of People. These People have valuable skills (finding land, building homes, knowing the law, etc.).
I mention this as it is not something you can build in a day. It takes months to build a relationship with the right People. Trust is also fundamental.
It means that the micro-community accesses a large network of People.

5. Capabilities
5.1. Skills required
We don’t need each one in the community to know all the required skills. Some skills can be in the group, can be around the group (neighbors), can be in Paraguay, or can be accessed online. What is fundamental is to have in the group folks who are willing to understand, and learn.
We need to have these core skills on site:
Farming (animals).
Farming (vegetables and fruits).
Water management.
Herbal treatment.
Emergency medical treatments.
Construction. We do not need experts in construction as construction is often a one-off activity.
Conflict resolution.
Problem-solving.
Team coordination.
Administrative & paperwork management. Potentially basic accounting skills.
5.2. Tools
The group will need several tools. Here are examples:
Car. The group can decide whether cars are shared or not.
Cold chamber. This is to preserve food.
Meat processing tools.
Gardening tools.
DIY tools: driller, harmer, saws, screwdrivers, etc. Some will be electric-powered.
Electricity tools.
Water quality testers.
EMF reader.

6. The land & Ownership
6.1. Search criteria
As a team, we are searching for a piece of land in Paraguay.
This piece of land may or may not have:
existing constructions on it.
vegetables, fruits, and/or farm animals on it.
The land should match as many requirements of the initial group as possible. Some requirements are a must - they are flagged with [MUST]. Among dozens of lands i visited, i did find a few pieces of land that meet most criteria.
[MUST] The land is legally owned. To prevent legal issues, the person selling the land owns it. In Paraguay, it happens that someone tries to sell land that they do not own (they do not have the land title) or that they co-own.
[MUST] Not in an area where intensive farming is happening, especially soybean and maize plantations. In these areas, fertilizers are intensively used to produce three to four harvests yearly. It means that soil, water, and air may be loaded with toxins that may impact the People's health nearby. The negative impact, especially on health, may only surface after years. You can refer to this map (https://capeco.org.py/soja-satelital-es/) to find out where soybean and maize plantations are in Paraguay.
[MUST] The area should not be colonized by bugs, insects, or mites that make your life on the land miserable. In Paraguay, some areas can be colonized by bugs, insects, or mites that will sting, bite, or even lay eggs on your skin. This can negatively impact your life. One or two land visits may not allow you to know if there are insects, bugs, or mites and the owner will often not tell you because they seek to sell their land. The only way to know is to spend time on the land and/or to talk to People who live on the land or close to the land. You should also use your observation skills. If you see swampy areas you can foresee that these areas are breeding grounds for mosquitoes. If you see dense forests you can imagine that there may be bugs living in them. Do not forget that there is a high quantity of parasites in Paraguay.
[MUST] A land with a clear perimeter. The land's perimeter is registered in the land registry. A land surveyor must be used to have precise coordinates of the land's perimeter. This avoids purchasing land that is not delimited. You may buy a piece of land and start building but realize that you do not own this part of your land.
The land size should be at least 15 hectares. For example, a rectangle of 500 meters by 300 meters = 150,000 m2 = 15 hectares. There is a paragraph below explaining the thought process to determine the land size. At 5,000 USD an hectare that is 75,000 USD. 40,000,000 Gs a hectare (5,000 USD) is a common reference. Some lands are cheaper; the more hectares you buy the cheaper the cost per hectare.
[MUST] The land is not mostly flat but has some relief.
[MUST] Good elevation of the land above sea level.
[MUST] The land shape should be convenient such as a square, a round, or a rectangle. The length should not disproportionately exceed the width of the land (for example, if the length is 1,000 meters and the width 100 meters then the length disproportionately outweighs the width). Note that lands in Paraguay often have a strip-like shape, but we could acquire several strips to increase the width.
[MUST] The land should be at least 90 minutes away, by car, from Asuncion. The idea is to not be within the reach of densely populated areas. If mandates or social chaos were to happen, it is preferable to be on the side of it.
[MUST] The land connection to a concrete road should be good. It means that the connection between the entrance of the land and the concrete road does not exceed 10 minutes at a speed of 15 km per hour (around 2.5 kilometers) and can be used by a car with a ground clearance of 20 cm. The road should not be excessively bumpy. The road can be used after rainy days (some roads are flooded after the rain and it is very difficult to drive them with a car or a motorbike). Also, it should not be required to cross a river to get to the land (some pieces of land require you to go through a stream of water). We may be able to improve a dirt road or even create a road.
[MUST] There is a water stream on the land. We aren’t talking about a very small stream of water. Be careful, often, small water streams are advertised as small rivers. It’s best to have a river of at least a few meter wide. It can potentially be widened. The water flow should be good (2 to 3 cubic meters per second). Based on my experience, having a river with a significant water flow makes a massive difference. A hydro dam can be installed. The water is fresher than if it stagnates. Water that stagnates brings mosquitoes.
[MUST] A water source(s) is located on the land. If the water source is on another land, we could lose access to this water (if the owner of the source diverts the stream for instance). The water could also be polluted because of the activities done on the land where the water comes from. It could be a major risk for the activities we do on the land.
[MUST] The water stream is not polluted. The stream could be polluted for instance if the water comes from a field where animals are being raised (pee, poo of animals) or where chemicals are used for farming.
[MUST] The land should be partially covered with trees. An ideal ratio would be 50% of the land covered with trees.
[MUST] The soil is fertile. It means that we can grow plants in the soil. Assessing this requirement may require a soil expert.
Note: soil that is in an open field has often been washed and burnt by the sun which means that it may be of poor quality. On the other hand, soil where there is a lot of vegetation may be high in nutrients. Even within the same area, you can have differences. Rivers can also influence the quality of the soil. Pay attention to soil erosion.
List of soils found in Paraguay: alluvial, ultisols (podzolic soils), oxisols and alfisols (structured red earth), planosols (alfisols), quartz sands and lithosols (entisols), solonetz (aridisols).
Type of soil by area (work in progress):
Colonia Iguazu: clay.
La Colmena: sandy.
Villa Florida: argyle.
Encarnacion: sandy.
[MUST] The soil needs to be of a good depth and not just rocks with a thin layer of soil.
[MUST] The soil should drain well to avoid the formation of a pool of water.
[MUST] No swampy areas. Swamps are a form of wetland. In Paraguay, you will observe areas where the water remains stationary. For instance, many fields are filled with water for part of the year and you can see the cows walking in the water. In a swamp, you will find parasites and insects.
[MUST] The land should be connected or connectable to an electric line of at least medium power (low power is 220V). If the land is not linked to the electric network, we need to factor in the installation. It is best to have a medium power line to arrive directly on the land (this prevents anyone from connecting to our electricity feed).
The land should be connected to public water. If this is not the case, we need to have access to water on the land. This means digging a well (artisan or classic one). Collecting rainwater may not be enough. Note that public water is likely highly chlorinated and possibly fluorated.
[MUST] An internet connection is available or can be installed. Preference for internet via fiber. If the internet is not installed, we need to install it either through an ISP like Personal, Claro, Tigo, or through Starlink. Some teammates do not want fiber as it is intrusive. Starlink could be an option.
[MUST] No communication tower nearby. As little electromagnetic frequencies as possible.
The view from several parts of the land is good. Often, People refer to an open view of the surrounding landscape.
There should be fruit trees on the land. Preferably fruit trees with decades of age. Example: mango, banana, lemon, orange.
A part of the land should have plain grass (an area with a limited number of trees/plants).
Exposure to the sun is good without being too much. A land with relief enables areas of shadow. For instance, in early morning and evening, the sun may be behind the hill. If we have a cliff then we may benefit from a cooler area. A river enables an area of trees. Some visited areas are constantly under the sun and the soil is unusable (the soil is burnt). This is often why the price per hectare is cheap.
The land has natural protection(s) and is not easy to enter. This goes beyond a barbel fence.
The land should have a fence or a physical border (a river, a dense vegetation area, a cliff, ...). If its borders are not fenced, we need to factor in the fence’s cost.
[MUST] Not under constant wind. Some lands are in wind corridors. For example, if you go to the top of the hills behind La Colmena, these areas are very windy. The land shouldn’t be too windy. Do note that the land may be in a wind corridor yet have natural protections against the wind such as cliffs, hills, or forests.
[MUST] Check if UNDRIP policies have any jurisdiction on the land.
6.2. How much land do we need?
It’s important to ask ourselves this question.
In Paraguay, some foreigners tend to be attracted by large pieces of land (50, 100+ hectares). It may be that they have money and, the land being relatively cheap, they dream big and do not anticipate what they will do with the space. I have met People in Paraguay who realized, after purchase, that they bought too much land and had to resell part or most of it.
One needs to have their feet on the ground and consider the point of having 2, 7, 15, 30, 60, 100, 250 hectares.
Why do we need that space?
I should also state clearly that our goal is to create a micro-community and not to invest in land to make a capital gain. It means that no one in the group should push the idea of buying large pieces of land to resell them later on at a profit. I am not supporting speculation on land prices as this doesn’t benefit People’s well-being and happiness.
Some of the communities may want to buy large pieces of land to preserve them (preventing forests from being cut for instance). We aren’t considering this at this point in time.
There is no point in purchasing too much land. It will be an additional cost and it may not be easy to resell.
The main drivers of the land size we target are:
Targeted food autonomy level and diet.
Do we want to reach 25% or 75% food autonomy? This impacts how much land we need.
Do we want to eat cereals, cows, vegetables? The land size requirement will vary.
Agro-tourism activities. For instance, if we create an eco-park on the land, we could need several hectares.
Noise. It shouldn’t be a driver but in Paraguay, it can be. There is a tendency for loud boom-boom style music in Paraguay and this can be annoying. It’s best to leave some space between you and your neighbors, especially if you are next to a rural neighborhood.
Here are some figures:
An individual house with a garden: 0.1 hectare or 1,000 m2. Let’s imagine we have 6 of them. That’s 0.6 hectares.
A forest. It depends on what you want. Is a forest of 200 meters by 200 meters large enough? That would be 4 hectares. What do you want to do with it?
Cow. A rule of thumb is one hectare or 10,000 square meters for one cow. A typical cow weighs 500 kg at slaughter. It yields 220/230 kilos of consumable meat. Let’s assume we will eat 250 grams of meat 5 days a week. That’s 65 kilograms of meat per year. 230/65=3.53. A cow can feed 3.5 persons for a year. We could also have other animals such as chickens and rabbits.
Agrotourism. Imagine you want to implement some form of agrotourism. Let’s imagine you need 300 meters by 200 meters. 6 hectares.
Trail. Imagine you want to preserve a space and create a trail. Let’s say an area of 500 meters by 700 meters. This is 35 hectares.
Those of you who have experience in farming know how much land you have and what this land can produce (quantity of food for X persons). Please feel free to give us your view on this topic based on an initial group of 10 People consuming meat, vegetables, and fruits.
6.3. Land prices in Paraguay
Land price is usually expressed in Guaranies per hectare. When it is a gringo price, the price is always in USD per hectare. A hectare is 10,000 square meters or 100 meters by 100 meters.
The price of land is increasing. I would even say that there is speculation on the price of land.
Around 2020, in La Colmena you could buy at 15,000,000 Gs per hectare. Now, the price is 60,000,000 Gs per hectare. In Mbocajaty, in 2022, you could buy at 15,000,000 Gs to 20,000,000 Gs per hectare. Now it is 50,000,000 Gs per hectare.
The average price of a hectare is 40,000,000 Gs as of the end of 2024.
The Paraguayans who own land see a lot of foreigners arriving as an opportunity to make a lot of money. If you can sell for USD 200,000 or USD 300,000, it is the equivalent of many decades of work salary.
A part of the foreigners who purchased land years ago are also speculating on the price of land. They either resell their land or cut some parts of it. They then resell at 3x, 4x, or 5x the price they paid for the land. They see other foreigners arriving as an opportunity to cash out on them.
It is important you know this information so that you do not get scammed. Land shouldn’t be for speculation. It is needed by local People (many of them cannot afford land anymore).
6.4. Where do we search for land?
Based on the above criteria, we search for land in specific areas of Paraguay. These areas are mapped in red on the Google Earth image below. These areas in red are mostly driven by altitude and being out of industrial-scale fertilized areas. We may discover new areas of interest. Please note that the areas defined in red add up to 115,000 hectares (1,150 square kilometers) which is a vast area.
We do not search for land in the Chaco area.
South of Paraguay (West side) could also be an option and this needs to be discussed between team members.
If you are searching for land to build a community, i would be happy to talk to you as i have seen many pieces of land for sale in Paraguay. I also team up with a real-estate agent to make sure these pieces of land are okay for purchase.
Below is a relief map. Dark red is the highest altitude, pink is the lowest. Although the Western part of Paraguay has more relief it is full of soja plantations.
6.5. What Are the Potential Setups to Purchase a Piece of Land?
This is a tricky part. There does not seem to be an obvious legal setup that allows us to buy a piece of land as a group while making it easy to protect us from each other. We are currently researching this topic. If you have an idea, please email me (julienparaguay@tuta.com).
My intuition is that we need a hybrid model. One that protects private property but also enables a project in common.
Let’s go back to the model we are used to: buying a piece of land under our name. Mr Schmoll purchases 10 hectares of land under his name. He is free to do whatever he wants with his land (within the limit of the laws). He can try to sell it. He can rent his land. He can build houses on his land and rent them. This option is great of Mr. Schmoll wants to live alone or with his family.
In our case, a few Mr. Schmoll want to team up and build their autonomy together yet they want to keep as much flexibility as they are used to under the buying process mentioned above. They are also concerned about one of the Mr. Schmoll's suddenly becoming a bad person.
Here are some options:
Option 1. Partial private. Partial shared.
The idea is that each one of us owns its individual plot and one plot is shared. For example, a land of 20 hectares and there are 4 parties for the initial purchase. Each party has one hectare inside the 20 hectares. That’s 4 hectares. 16 hectares are shared. If you are not happy with 1 hectare, push it to 2 for instance. It is just an example.
The advantage is that each party has full control over their private area. There is no financial or legal link between your plot where your house is and the other plots. You will define how much you want to spend on your plot.
One plot will be shared. In our example, the 4 parties could be on the land title with a defined percentage (it may be that they all put the same amount of money or a different one). For this part financials could be in common.
Please let us know if you see any inconvenience in this setup.
Requirements:
We would need to split the land into 5 pieces (or X pieces). Is this legally doable? Julien is checking this point. If anyone else can check, please do.
You could ask: why don’t we buy fractions (loteamientos) in that case?
Well, the price per hectare will not be interesting as the average price of a fraccion is 35,000,000 Gs for 30 meters by 11 meters. Even if we get a discount for purchasing many, we will still be above the market price per hectare. Also, there would be other drawbacks like the lack of trees, the other folks living in proximity, the dependency on utilities, etc.
Option 2. Equal co-ownership of land.
In this setup, each party contributes an equal share to the land purchase and owns an equal portion. A co-ownership agreement is written to outline how we will operate (rights, responsibilities, sale of shares, …).
As we equally invested in the land we are less prone to argue on this topic (“i put more money in so i have more say”). Costs are equally divided.
This assumes that all parties can put in the same amount of money. It means that the share will be defined by whoever will put the least amount of money. It means that the land we can afford is conditioned by the party who will put the least amount of money. If one party can put a maximum of USD 25,000 in the land and there are 4 parties then the land should not be above USD 100,000.
Research the option of creating a cooperative for the common space.

7. Financials
7.1. People’s Budget
We consider two complementary perspectives for those making the initial purchase:
Personal Allocation: How much each member or stakeholder can allocate toward the initiative. For example, if we have four stakeholders and each can invest USD 40,000 for the initial cost, our total available budget is USD 160,000. Similarly, if each has a budget of USD 2,000 for recurring costs, our collective recurring budget is USD 8,000.
How Much Do We Need to Execute Our Plan?
Our overall budget is driven by the cost of land and the necessary infrastructure. In Paraguay, land typically costs around USD 5,000 per hectare (as of the end of 2024). For a 15-hectare property (150,000 m²), this amounts to roughly USD 75,000—excluding taxes, commissions, and additional fees.
Beyond land, we must invest in enhancing the property for community living. This includes constructing homes, which can range from USD 2,000 to USD 25,000 per unit (depending on the building type), as well as improving paths, common spaces, and installing utilities such as electricity and water systems (including well digging). Based on an estimated house cost of USD 17,500, the average initial investment per party (with 4 parties) could be around USD 42,000.
While contributions need not be exactly equal, overall funding must be sufficient to cover these costs, and any disparities will be addressed collectively. These figures are preliminary and will be refined as we gather further data and feedback.
Note that members do not have to invest equally; however, if someone’s capacity is too low compared to the group’s minimum, it may not be feasible to include them initially. This decision will be taken collectively.
7.2. Initial Costs
Initial costs cover all expenses required before the community becomes operational. These include:
Land Purchase Costs:
Listed land price (which may include or exclude real estate agent commission).
Taxes on the land purchase.
Other fees related to the purchase.
Construction Costs:
Residential Homes: Options include standard brick homes, A-type houses, or earthship designs. (For example, a house may have a budget of USD 2,000 to USD 25,000+.)
Foundations, Structure, Walls, Roof, Water, Electricity, Septic Tank.
Common Space Enhancements:
Creation and improvement of paths.
Construction or enhancement of common spaces (e.g., shared gathering areas, workshops).
Enhancements to electric lines and water provisioning (a well may be required).
Include expert advice on where to dig the well (e.g., free or near-free with a pendulum; about 4,000,000 Gs with machines in Q4 2024).
This section is based on a land of 15 hectares and assumes an average initial cost of around USD 42,000 per party if there are 4 parties. (Note that many small costs might be missing; these figures are high-level estimates.)
7.3. Recurring Costs
Recurring costs are ongoing expenses necessary to maintain the community’s operations. These include:
Government Fees: Charges related to owning the land.
Operational Fees: Fees for operating the company (if a legal entity is used for the purchase).
Utility Bills: Water and electricity costs.
Maintenance Costs:
Cutting the grass, maintaining paths, and tending to trees.
Maintenance of electric and water provisioning systems.
Animal Care:
Feeding animals and providing treatments when required.
7.4. Revenues
Revenue generation is addressed from two perspectives:
Individual Professional Revenues:
Each member may generate income through their own professional activities. These revenues are kept separate in personal bank accounts, with individual tax responsibilities.
Common Activity Revenues:
Revenues generated by community activities in the common space. Examples include:
Selling surplus honey from bees raised communally.
Surplus wood production.
Demand for herbal medicines produced on site.
Rental income from two bungalows built on the common land.
The community will decide together how these shared revenues are allocated.
7.5. Financial Structure & Responsibilities
To ensure transparency and fairness, our financial management will be built on clear structures and responsibilities:
Initial and Recurring Contributions:
Members will commit to initial contributions as outlined in the above section and cover recurring costs on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Transparency Measures:
We will maintain a shared financial ledger that is accessible to all members. This ledger can be in an Open Office spreadsheet which is backed up online.
A designated treasurer (or pair) will be responsible for tracking contributions, expenses, and revenue from common activities. This person should be knowledgeable with spreadsheets and accounting.
Alternative Contributions:
For People who may not be able to contribute fully in cash, alternative contributions (such as additional labor hours or in-kind services) may be considered. To be discussed with the group.
Financial Dispute Resolution:
Clear protocols will be established to resolve any financial disputes that may arise, ensuring issues are addressed promptly and fairly.
Separation of Finances:
Personal professional revenues remain individual, while common revenues are managed collectively according to the agreed-upon guidelines.
Review and Adjustment:
The financial structure and contributions will be reviewed periodically (at least bi-annually) to adjust for changing costs and circumstances.

8. Cultivating Our Resilience
In this section, we are discussing activities done in the context of the group. We are not discussing your individual activities.
8.1. Guiding Principles
Below are some guiding principles for the activities we do as a group. Feel free to challenge them and to suggest new ones. We should only have a handful of them but they should guide our actions.
Well-being (health of the mind and the body) and happiness
Remember what we seek. No matter what activity we do, we should check that it is aligned with this principle. If it isn't then maybe we should consider whether we should do it or not.
Autonomy
We should ask ourselves if what we do is supporting our autonomy or increasing our dependence.
Simplicity
Keep things simple. Avoid complexity as much as possible. Complexity is difficult to understand. It is difficult to manage. It is often costly to maintain.
Creativity
We welcome your imagination and creativity. Your mind should have space to think and create. A common characteristic among the People joining this type of initiative is their enthusiasm and skills for creating things (such as music, arts, mechanics, etc.). Many of you will be given the opportunity to do things you love.
8.2. Developing Autonomies
The People who are interested in joining this project are interested in growing their autonomy and being less (or not) dependent on the system for their thinking, water, food, healing, energy, communication, and transport.
We can anticipate that each one of us will be involved (with different levels of involvement) in setting up and maintaining the autonomy of the group.
Reaching 100% autonomy in all the domains mentioned above may not be doable but the goal is to have a high level of autonomy to:
avoid toxins (in water, food, air, medical solutions, and communication systems) and consequently safeguard our well-being and happiness.
weather any shortage of water, food, communication, transportation, or healing solutions.
maintain our leverage versus the system. One of the common patterns used by global organizations and relayed by national governments is to tell the population that they will not have access to A, B, or C (transportation, water, food, etc) if they do not do action X or Y. The goal is to have our own A, B and C.
8.2.1. Thinking Autonomy
The most fundamental autonomy that you can build. We expect that all the folks who want to join and will join a micro-community have thinking autonomy. They can think by themselves and are not constantly reusing what the system requests them to say.
The micro-community is a space where your mind has space to think. You can have interesting conversations with other People in the group as well as visitors.
Many of you value the connection with nature and the fact of not being under situation of brain fog and tiredness.
8.2.3. Drinking Healthy Water (supported by water autonomy)
This one should not be complicated to achieve as there is a lot of water in Paraguay. Many of the lands you and i visit have water sources. It will be important to analyze the water regularly to ensure that it is clean and free of any chemicals. If needed, we can dig a well, from a few meters to hundreds of meters. There are technics to identify the location of underground pockets of water.
Recently i discovered a new perspective around water. Healthy water should also have the right properties so that your cells can benefit from it. This will be added to the best practices document.
Water autonomy goes in pair with water lifecycle. We can put in place a system to recycle our water.
8.2.3. Eating Clean and Healthy at a Relatively Cheap Cost (supported by food autonomy)
It is a critical component of what we build. Reaching 100% food autonomy is tough. We need to agree on a plan that is doable with the available resources.
We should factor in that we may have the option to trade with neighbors for food.
Strategy:
Define food needs per person (meat, fish, vegetables, fruits, nuts).
Compute the overall food needs of the group.
Set a level of autonomy that we want to reach after 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months for each category (25%, 50%, 75%, or 90+%).
Define an action plan for each category.
An example: starting with raising chickens and ducks to get meat and eggs to reach 25% of food autonomy after 6 months. This is just an example!
Category
What do we grow?
How much of it do we grow?
When do we grow it?
Where do we grow it?
Who knows how to grow it?
Who will be in charge of growing it?
How much is required to take care of it?
What technic are we going to use?
What are the key pitfalls to avoid?
The difference between full autonomy and our current autonomy can be provided by local products and supermarkets. Some of us have already identified organic meat producers.
We may identify short-term and long-term strategies. For example, many fruit trees could be planted but we likely benefit from their yield only 4 or 5 years later.
Farm animals
Options: chickens, ducks, geese, guinea fowls, sheep, nandou, and cows. We exclude rabbits for now as they may carry diseases. If you think that one of these farm animals should be excluded, please let me know.
The idea is to start small and expand.
Key challenges:
Protect farm animals from parasites and treat them on time when they have parasites.
Fish
It is possible to raise fish and/or to get fish from some rivers.
Key challenges:
Temperature of the pond. Some fish may die if the water temperature is too hot or cold.
Fruits
The land may already have several fruit trees. Some of the common fruit trees in Paraguay are mango, papaya, pineapple, guava, orange, mandarin, nectarine, avocado, banana (humid, wet areas), cantaloupe, watermelon, and lemon.
Among the tropical fruits are passion fruit, pitanga, acerola, mamon, yerba mate fruit, tamarind, and nance.
Among exotic fruits are avocado, fig, persimmon, pomegranate, jackfruit, and dragon fruit.
Vegetables
Some of the vegetables are mandioca, tomato, onion, carrots, sweet potato, lettuce, pumpkin, maize, eggplant, cabbage, spinach, beetroot, radish, chard, broccoli, cauliflower, and artichoke.
We may distinguish perennial vegetables.
Mushrooms
To be added.
Key challenges:
Protect fruits and vegetables from the sun and insects.
Plants
Some wild plants are edible.
8.2.4. Healing Our Body (supported by healing autonomy)
The idea of being self-sufficient in terms of healing. It is a mix of skills and resources such as plants, herbs, etc.
Ideas:
Herbal medicine garden
The stock of critical products such as CDS, DMSO
Skills related to treatments: physiotherapy, chiropractic, etc. These skills could be shared across communities.
8.2.5. Creating Our Energy (supported by energy autonomy)
Generating our energy to power appliances.
Ideas:
Implementation of a hydro dam.
Installation of solar panels, inverter, and/or batteries.
8.2.6. Communicating With Each Other (supported by communication autonomy)
If the traditional communication network is not available, we could have other ways to communicate. Talkie walkies and HF radio may be an option.
The goal is to maintain communication between People of the group and even neighbors, and other communities.
The goal is also to keep our conversations private in a context where global services such as Facebook, WhatsApp, and others unofficially access our private communications.
8.2.7. Ability to Move (supported by moving autonomy)
In case of a shortage of gasoline or diesel, we may not be able to move easily. We may also be constrained by mandates.
Ideas:
Bicycles
Horses. They could also be used for an agro-tourism business.
Having a significant land size to be able to move around without the feeling of being in jail. Do note that tree coverage is interesting as it partially prevents direct surveillance through drones.
8.2.8. Revenue Generating Activities
It is possible and beneficial to develop activities on the project. These activities allow participants and the micro-community to earn an income. Some activities can be done individually and some can be done as a group.
I have no doubts that we will have multiple ideas of businesses. The most important will be the projects and activities we do not focus on. Why? because our time will be limited and it will matter to allocate it wisely.
Here are some examples of revenue-generating activities:
Rental of lodges
Access fee to a river, BBQ area
Agrotourism
Sales of food products
Sales of handicraft
8.3. Tools Supporting Our Autonomy
To grow our autonomy, we will need tools.
Here are examples:
Car. The group can decide whether cars are shared or not.
Cold chamber. This is to preserve food.
Meat processing tools.
Gardening tools.
DIY tools: driller, harmer, saws, screwdrivers, etc. Some will be electric-powered.
Electricity tools.
Water quality testers.
EMF reader.
8.4. Consolidating best practices for micro-communities
It makes sense to document what we do and gather best practices in an online repository. It will help us and other micro-communities.
The idea is to capture best practices. They could also be the foundation for a business activity that generates revenues for the network of communities.

9. Operating Guidelines
These guidelines exist to help us operate in a harmonious way. They should be defined by the group and agreed by all People. They contribute to the stability of the group.
9.1. Defining Shared Activities
We are going to run several shared activities. This will be in parallel with our personal daily activities. To make the best use of our time, we should have an organized approach as to define the activities we will work on together. Here is a step-by-step approach:
We all agree on the objectives we want to reach
These objectives are quantified
These objectives are visible (on a board) and have a timeline
Actions and resources required are defined for each objective
A person is responsible for the activity
Progress is shared during the weekly sync-up
Issues that require the attention of the group are mentioned daily
9.2. Group Collaboration Method
One of the collaborative methods to operate as a group is called shared governance or governance in a circle (a French organization, “L'universite du nous”, has described this practice: https://universite-du-nous.org/). People form a circle (sit in a circle) and no one has the role of a chef. The goal of forming a circle is to show that we are all part of the circle (equal) and proposals, statements, and objections are put in the middle of the circle. They are not addressed to someone. If you have never practiced this governance method, it may be a bit uncomfortable at first and you may naturally revert to the hierarchical governance model (even if you do not like it). After a while, the team operates on a whole new level. There are no more egos in the room, decisions are taken without all the emotional drama, conflicts disappear, etc.
9.3. Decision making
Regarding decisions, the idea is to take decisions, as a group, once all objections have been addressed. Objections aren’t seen as roadblocks but opportunities to refine and improve decisions. Let's use an example: some of the teammates would like to cut 4 hectares of forest to have space for a number of additional cows. “It is proposed to clear 4 hectares of forest to get space for 5 additional cows. Is there any objection to doing so?” One of the teammate raises their hand and has an objection: “i am concerned about the cost and which are do we pick”. The goal is to address these concerns as a team. Once the objection has been resolved we can move forward. It could be that we cannot resolve an objection. In this case, we cannot proceed with the action. The different teammates can continue discussing until a solution is found.
9.4. The Work is Visible
The best way to ensure participation and progress in common activities is to make work visible. We are not here to control each other but our autonomy depends on actions done. If these actions aren’t done then we are unlikely to reach our objectives.
The work should be visible on large physical boards (blackboard for instance). It enables People to stay informed of critical information:
What is being done
Who does what
Where do things stand
Do we have issues
It enables asynchronous communication as we may not be able to meet every day.
9.5. Sync-ups
There should be at least a weekly sync-up where all settlers are gathered. Attendance should be mandatory. It ensures that everyone has access to the same information and can voice concerns. It's not a lunch or a dinner. It’s not a bar discussion. It starts and ends at the same time every week. it shouldn’t be more than one hour long (past 40 minutes, People’s attention significantly drops down). The purpose of this weekly sync-up is to:
Review progress made during the past week
Define capacity for the upcoming week (availability of each one of us)
Define the activities to be done in the upcoming week
Raise and address issues
For the settlers and visitors living on the land, the synchronization can happen face-to-face when they see each other. A suggestion would be to have a board in one of the common spaces so that information is highly visible and accessible.
9.6. Time Allocated to Common Activities
This will depend on what we want to achieve as a group.
Below is an example of a set of objectives:
100% water autonomy 3 months after living on site.
100% healthy water 6 months after living on site.
33% and 75% food autonomy, respectively 12 and 24 months after living on site.
50% energy autonomy 12 months after living on site.
75% healing autonomy 6 months after living on site.
50% communication autonomy within the group 6 months after living on site.
100% transport autonomy within a range of 10 kilometers from the land within 18 months after living on site.
Also, the availability of each one of us has to be taken into account.
9.7. Entries and exits of People
This is not an easy topic.
Let’s list the requirements before coming up with guidelines:
The legal structure has to accommodate the requirements defined in this section as much as possible while not being overly complicated.
We need stability in terms of People at the beginning of the initiative.
We don’t expect the folks who started this initiative to exit it a few months later. That would be disruptive and the initiative may fail because of this.
It means that the folks who initially purchase the land and will live on the land should plan to stay on the land and participate in the micro-community for at least a few years.
A party (individual or family) who is strongly interested in joining should be able to try the initiative before committing to the longer term.
We cannot ask you to commit right away to a long-term engagement in the community. We also don’t know you. We should have a method to let you test the community and see if this is the right setup for you. Also, we should not allow everyone to test the setup as People will abuse it. You will also be asked to pay for your trial which includes accommodation. In this context, we may define a “visitor” profile to differentiate “visitors” from People who live permanently in the micro-community (“settlers”).
A party should be able to join this micro-community or another one.
If a party (individual or family) wants to join the micro-community, it should be able to do so. We assume that the micro-community is agreeing to let this party in.
A party in the micro-community should be able to leave it.
If a party wants to leave, it should be able to do so provided this departure does not negatively impact, beyond a defined threshold, the micro-community. The party leaving may get back his money, partially or fully. This has to be defined and depends on the legal setup we will use.
A party should be allowed to not be on site a few months a year.
Although this is not a formal “entry” or “exit” it is mentioned in this section.
For various reasons, you may not be on-site for a few months per year. We should not ask you to leave if you cannot or do not want to be on-site all year round. It could be that one of your family members is sick, that you cannot stay in Paraguay during the hottest months, etc. Your well-being and happiness may depend on you not being on-site a few months a year. The team has to define a number of days per year that is acceptable. By default, i would suggest 80% of the year on-site which means 73 days out per year (10 weeks). This is not cumulative meaning that if you do not use your quota for a year you cannot carry it forward to the next year. You also cannot use two consecutive periods of 73 days otherwise the duration of your absence (up to 146 days) may have a significant impact on the group.
Based on the requirements, we have established clear entry, trial, and exit guidelines. These rules balance commitment with personal freedom, preventing disruption while allowing new members to integrate properly.
9.7.1. Entering the Micro-Community
1.1 Trial Period (Visitor Phase)
Before committing long-term, a new party (individual or family) must go through a trial period to assess compatibility with the community.
The trial is a paid stay, covering accommodation and shared expenses.
Visitors must actively participate in daily life, including shared work and community interactions.
At the end of the trial, both the visitor and the community must mutually agree on long-term integration.
Trial spots are limited to prevent abuse of the system.
1.2 Becoming a Permanent Settler
Once accepted, the new settler commits to staying in the community for at least a few years.
The legal structure will define financial contributions, property rights, and potential refunds upon exit.
Settlers must adhere to community rules and contribute to shared responsibilities.
9.7.2. Exiting the Micro-Community
2.1 Voluntary Exit
A member (individual or family) can choose to leave, but:
The departure should not destabilize the community beyond an agreed threshold.
Financial reimbursement policies (if any) will be defined based on the legal structure.
A notice period may be required to ensure a smooth transition for the remaining members.
2.2 Involuntary Exit (Exceptional Cases)
In cases where a member seriously disrupts the community, an exit process may be initiated.
This includes consistent rule-breaking, non-participation, or major conflicts.
The decision must go through a structured process involving the community.
9.7.3. Temporary Absences
Settlers are allowed to be off-site for up to 73 days per year (about 10 weeks).
This absence is not cumulative—unused days cannot be carried over to the next year.
Extended absences beyond this limit may require discussion with the community to ensure they do not negatively impact group dynamics.
9.8. Resolving Disputes in the Community
In our micro-community, open and respectful communication is essential. When issues arise, they must be talked about early—avoiding conversations or ignoring tensions is not an option. Addressing conflicts promptly prevents resentment from building up and ensures that small issues do not escalate.
For example, imagine that Maria and Lucas disagree about the use of a shared tool. Maria believes Lucas is not returning it to the communal storage, while Lucas feels he should be able to keep it at his workspace for convenience. Instead of avoiding each other or letting frustration grow, they talk about it directly, at a good time—not when they are tired or under pressure. They listen to each other’s concerns, acknowledge any stress they may be feeling, and work toward a solution together.
If they cannot resolve the issue on their own, a neutral third party—someone outside their family—will step in as a mediator to facilitate a fair discussion. If mediation does not lead to a resolution, and the conflict seriously disrupts the community, a structured exit process may be considered. In extreme cases where relationships are too strained to repair, one or both parties may be asked to leave to protect the well-being of the group.
By fostering mutual respect, direct communication, and early conflict resolution, we ensure that the micro-community remains a positive and cooperative environment for all.
9.9. Ensuring Security
In our micro-community, security is a shared responsibility that protects our people, property, and resources. We will implement practical measures to create a safe and supportive environment:
Perimeter Protection:
Establish secure boundaries around the common land through fencing or natural barriers (such as dense vegetation or cliffs) to control access and prevent unauthorized entry.Access Control:
Develop clear protocols for visitors and vehicles entering the community. This includes maintaining a visitor log, using designated entry points, and ensuring that all community members are aware of security guidelines.Monitoring and Surveillance:
Utilize simple monitoring tools such as periodic patrols, community check-ins, and, if necessary, discreet surveillance (e.g., community-managed cameras) to detect any unusual activity while respecting everyone’s privacy.Emergency Preparedness:
Create an emergency response plan that covers medical emergencies, natural disasters, or potential security breaches. This includes maintaining a well-stocked first-aid kit, training in basic first aid and emergency protocols, and establishing clear communication channels for urgent alerts.Community Collaboration:
Encourage an environment of mutual responsibility where every member feels empowered to report suspicious activities and work together to address any potential threats. Regular security meetings will help keep the community vigilant and responsive.
9.10. Managing Risks
Our micro-community acknowledges that risks—whether related to financial, environmental, or interpersonal challenges—must be proactively managed. We will use a systematic approach to identify, monitor, and mitigate risks:
Risk Identification:
Regularly assess both internal and external factors that could impact our community. This includes monitoring financial fluctuations, environmental changes (such as extreme weather events), and potential interpersonal conflicts.Early Warning Systems:
Establish clear thresholds and indicators (e.g., low well-being scores, financial shortfalls) to signal when a risk is emerging. Early detection allows us to intervene before issues become critical.Contingency Planning:
Develop specific contingency plans for various risk scenarios. For instance, in the event of a natural disaster, have clear evacuation routes and emergency contacts; for financial challenges, agree on mechanisms to reallocate funds or temporarily adjust contributions.Conflict Mediation:
Integrate our conflict resolution protocols into risk management by addressing disputes as soon as they arise. A designated mediator will work with the involved parties to resolve issues and, if necessary, activate an exit process to preserve the community’s stability.Regular Review and Adaptation:
Schedule periodic risk reviews during community meetings to update our strategies based on new insights or changes in circumstances. This flexible approach ensures that our risk management remains effective and relevant over time.Documentation and Transparency:
Maintain clear records of identified risks, the actions taken, and the outcomes. This transparency builds trust among community members and provides a reference for refining our practices over time.

10. Our Homes
Your home is likely important to you. People can get very emotional about it.
Based on my numerous discussions there are diverse perspectives:
Folks who want to try a building technique. Often, they have never tried it yet.
Folks who know what they want. They have the plan of their home built in their head.
Folks who see the house as functional.
One approach is to propose a standard construction at a fair price. Something around USD 15,000 to 20,000.
Based on what i see, a house can be ready in 2 to 3 months. Some may take way longer.
The Best Practice Guide includes key information regarding construction.

11. Well-being check-in
To ensure that our micro-community remains focused on well-being and happiness, we could institute a Weekly Well-Being Check-In. This practice is designed to help every member share their physical and mental state in a simple, consistent, and supportive way. The process is as follows:
Self-Rating Survey:
Each week, every community member will complete a brief survey with two key questions:“How does your body feel?”
“How does your mind feel?”
Responses will be given on a 5-point scale (1 = very low, 5 = excellent) and can include a simple emoticon (e.g., a sad face for low scores, a neutral face for moderate, and a happy face for high scores).
Visual Mood Board (Optional):
In addition to the survey, members can use a physical board in a common area where they place color-coded stickers (green for good, yellow for moderate, red for low) next to their name—this is entirely optional and can be done anonymously if preferred. The board allows everyone to see overall trends without pinpointing any individual immediately.Aggregated Feedback & Trend Analysis:
A designated community liaison (or rotating mediator) will collect the survey results and create an aggregated summary. For example, the summary might show that the community's average physical well-being is 4.2, while the average mental well-being is 3.8 for that week.Private, Supportive Check-In:
If a member’s scores consistently fall into the lower ranges (yellow or red) for a few consecutive weeks, the designated mediator will initiate a private, supportive check-in. This conversation will be conducted in a confidential and non-judgmental manner to:Express genuine concern and empathy.
Ask open-ended questions such as, “I noticed your well-being scores have been lower recently—how are you feeling?”
Offer assistance or adjustments to workloads and responsibilities if needed.
Schedule a follow-up conversation to monitor progress.
Group Discussion and Collective Support:
During our weekly community meeting, a general summary of the well-being check-ins will be shared. This summary will help the group identify overall trends and address common issues without singling out any individual. If widespread challenges are identified, the group can discuss collective strategies to improve well-being, such as adjusting schedules or reassigning tasks.Respect and Confidentiality:
While the check-in process is designed to be open and supportive, individual responses are treated with the utmost confidentiality. The goal is not to expose anyone but to ensure that everyone’s well-being is supported through early intervention and collective care.
By integrating the Weekly Well-Being Check-In into our routine, we foster a culture of transparency and care. This practice helps us detect issues early, offer targeted support, and ultimately maintain a resilient community where both body and mind can thrive.

12. Local Integration
Local integration is fundamental. When you do not work on your integration in a new country you may run into big troubles because locals will perceive you as “foreign”.
We do not seek to be an isolated group of People hidden in nature inside Paraguay.
The support network that we create inside our group should extend outside of the boundary of our land.
Here are ideas:
Engage nearby locals for some work
Contribute to local development. Identify potential improvements that could increase the well-being and happiness of local folks. Draw their attention to these aspects and assess their interest in doing something. There is no point in doing something that local folks do not want or are not taking responsibility for.

13. Timeline
13.1. Where Do We Stand on this Initiative?
My wife and i arrived in Paraguay in June 2024 and spent months observing People and land. We continue to do so. We have learned a lot and are way more careful about who we engage with. We had a good lesson learned with folks who were friendly but opportunist and manipulative (even between them).
I spent most of my time in Paraguay in the countryside, not in Asuncion. I have seen many pieces of land for sale (hundreds) as i traveled by motorbike to different areas, including remote areas.
Building the Plan
We are currently at the stage of describing and improving the plan (this page that you are looking at), factoring in dozens of feedback and addressing questions.
Forming the Core Group
We are in discussion with several folks who are interested in this initiative. We have met some of them face-to-face several times.
Finding People
Julien is running a video call every Sunday at 6 pm UTC to present the initiative and discuss it.
Finding Land
A few pieces of land have been identified. One is a potential candidate. Do note that the market is dynamic. I spend some of my time searching for pieces of land that match the criteria (full list on this page).
In February 2025, Julien is now teaming up with a real estate agent. This is considerably increasing land options for the micro-community.
13.2. What Are the Next Steps?
Assuming the next steps are done, below are the high-level next steps:
Agree on the plan
Purchase the land (detailed procedure written in the Best Practices Guide)
Identify improvements required to move into the land
Do these improvements
Move on the land (physically live full-time on it)
Start our shared activities
13.3. How Long Do i Need to Commit for?
We expect the initiative to span over multiple years as our autonomy will not be built in a few months. If you are in the core group of People who will purchase the land, you should commit for the next few years.
This page aims at reducing the gap between your expectations and the reality. This is why a lot of time is spent to inform you and discuss the plan.
If you are joining the micro-community after the land has been purchased, we are likely to propose you a trial period, on-site, so that we can assess whether or not we see ourselves living together for the next few years. Please refer to the section “Entries and exits of People”.

14. Long term vision: a network of Micro-communities
The long-term vision is to create a network of micro-communities.
Instead of having one community of a hundred People it is more wise to create ten micro-communities of ten People. Why?
A network of 10 communities would usually be more resilient than a community of 100 People
The risk of failure is lower. Centralized structures usually are points of failure. If one of the 10 communities fails this should not impact the 9 others. If the community of 100 People fails, everyone gets impacted.
Communities can learn from each other.